I had applied to be on the Landmark's commission twice in the last 2-3 years. I have a great interest in historical architecture and studied many of the styles that appear in Oshkosh when an art student many years ago. It is still an interest of mine. Mr. Tower had stated during his candidacy and after his election that he would be looking for new faces to join committees to bring in fresh ideas. Mrs. Mattox was appointed to the Landmark's Commission as she had been a member while on the council. The next seat was filled by a gentleman I am not familiar with except that he knew someone already on the Commission. I was satisfied with the thought that the two people chosen over myself were better qualified. There was no reason to make an issue of it.It's not like the fate of the universe hinges on just whatever the hell it is that the Landmarks Commission does, but you know ...
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
One Other Thing...
Don't be surprised if Michelle Monte is appointed to fill Buchholtz's seat on the Landmarks Commission. Not saying it's going to happen -- just don't be surprised if it does:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
duly noted Sir *salutes*
and lol @ the level of Drama and Intrique that would suddenly overtake the previously somnambulent Landmarks committee
Isn't that what usually happens when a douche gets put on a board where they don't belong? Watch what happens to the plan commission with a Monte there. Between Tweedledee and Tweedledumb (Monte and McHugh) it ought to make for comical times.
Couldn't be any worse than our past BOE "president" and her strip show at the Grand. Now that was class.
Strip show? You must have been at Naughty Girls while A.W. was performing at the Grand.
Post a Comment