Sunday, August 15, 2010

Ron Johnsonomics, or How to Eliminate the Competition from Your Business Plan without even Trying

This sentence caught my eye reading an otherwise positive piece in the Onalaska Holmen Courier-Life:
Pacur started with just one customer, Curwood, a company co-founded by Johnson’s father-in-law, Howard Curler.
That probably sounds pretty innocuous, maybe even a little cute: a brash start-up valiantly trying to make it in this crazy world, the old man chipping in to help out ... but that's really not an accurate way of looking at things.

Curwood is actually a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bemis Corp. and has been since 1965, twelve years before Johnson started Pacur. In other words, his father-in-law wasn't just helping out Pacur by throwing some business its way, this was a corporate giant (that made almost $5 billion last year and has been a publicly-traded company since the early 1970s) granting a lucrative subcontract to a company with no prior track record for delivery.

Those kinds of business relationships only come about through crazy connections and in this case the connections were familial.

Apparently, Bemis has remained Pacur's largest customer ever since.

This isn't a small detail. It's probably a lot easier to secure a loan for manufacturing capital when you can explain to the loan officer at the bank that your small business is guaranteed a fat contract from a local supplier once it gets up and running. It may very well be the reason why Pacur even exists in the first place.

I don't want to begrudge Pacur its success -- cashing in on family connections is just smart business -- but it is not, repeat, not an example of the "free market" principles that Johnson extols continuously on the campaign trail. I'm sure that Pacur provided Bemis with a quality product, but I sincerely doubt they have faced much competition. Let's face it: Curwood was never going to pull the plug on a contract co-owned by the owner's son and son-in-law. When a person or company is all but guaranteed a significant portion of it's annual income regardless of performance, well, that sounds an awful lot like welfare.

Johnson may rail against government handouts and sing the praises of Ayn Rand, but his career in business is an illustrative example of how even "Free Markets" are never actually completely "free." Even if we lived in a laissez faire paradise without any government regulation or taxes, we still would never live in a completely "free market." Had I produced a product for Bemis of higher quality and at half the cost, would anyone believe I would have stood a chance of competing for Pacur's contract with Curwood? Of course not: the livelihoods of the owner's son, daughter and grandchildren depended on money moving from Bemis through Curwood and to Pacur.

No wonder Johnson is such a big proponent of the "free market" -- it's been competition "free" for most of his career.

In a sense, Johnson owes much of his good fortune to a form of private sector welfare. Yes, Pacur has other clients, but a big part of business is building a foundation from which to work on, and that was essentially provided for Johnson by virtue of his family connections. Had he not married into the Curler family Johnson might still be keeping the books at a class ring-making company instead of becoming the President of a plastics manufacturing company.

The other angle to this story involves is the extent of Bemis' partnership with Pacur over the years. Part of the persona that Johnson is selling to voters is that of the savvy business leader who knows how to create manufacturing jobs. That may be true, but if Bemis is responsible for 50%, 60%, 75% of Pacur's business, then Johnson really hasn't been responsible for growing a business so much as that business is essentially a glorified subsidiary of Bemis.

In a recent TV spot Johnson tried to frame the Senate race as a common sense businessman with 30+ years of creating jobs vs. a career politician. It's easy to critique the "career politician's" record because Feingold's made thousands of votes in the last 20 years, so perhaps we should start giving Pacur the same level of scrutiny?

I don't doubt that Johnson is a hard worker, but his business history simply does not jive with his Randian conception of the economy. Johnson has been the recipient of numerous enormous breaks that a vast majority of people don't get in their careers and to pretend like he's some kind of economic ubermensch who will led us to prosperity through the sheer force of his own will to power is ridiculous.

11 comments:

Stewie said...

<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
<3 Baby, I love you <3
<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

that was SOOOOOO awesome
really good work dude, it doesn't get any better than this

Anonymous said...

There is a large disconnect between Johnson's devotion to Ayn Rand and his devotion to the Catholic church. (Though Lutheran,he is a well known mega philanthropist to Oshkosh Catholic schools.) Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged (recommended by Johnson and his people)emphasizes individualism and power - at any cost. It is antithetical to Christianity and most specifically to Catholic Social Teaching. I'd love to hear how he is able to reconcile these opposing philosophies.

Dad29 said...

(that made almost $5 billion last year

Typical Lefty, doesn't know the difference between "SALES" and "PROFIT."

They did NOT "make" $5Bn. That was their sales volume. Subtract materials, labor, taxes, burden, regulatory costs.....

UW-Zero has a good business school. Try 1st semester accounting.

Stewie said...

Dad seems to be focusing on a tiny piece of dust in the corner when there's a pile of shit on the table. I wonder why.
The point is not to go over the earnings statement of Ron's business. Whether is company made X Billion or million, or if he made 890,000 adjusted gross last year, or 1 million the year before or some slight variations on those themes -
he is one rich mutherfucker.

So now that we have defined our Terms, let's re-cap that the obviously glaring point of this article is that RON married a rich girl whose daddy set him up in business and now he's
A Rich MutherFucker who thinks he can BUY AN ELECTION, while he talks about how everyone else should make it thru their Hard Knock Life and be a "self-made man". So Ron basically slept his way to the top. Not an admirable quality in a male OR female.

THAT was the point Dad. Nice piece of dust though, very entertaining.
BTW us dumb Libs can all go to Accounting 101 if you like but the Big Pile of Shit is still on the table. Most Wisconsin working people do not respect a Boss man who has married into a position of comfort and power.
Enjoy.

John Foust said...

Why, who can forget Dad29's endless criticisms of Joe the Plumber, who had similar confusions about net, gross, the value of a business, and the chance he'd be able to buy-out the boss.

Jb said...

Is that the best you can do, Dad 29?

Stewie said...

yeah, pretty flaccid wasn't it?

Stewie BooHooie said...

oh yeah, but I just realized, you always ignore me, and I was gonna ignore you back. I just forgot for a minute there..
okay now I'm seriously ignoring your ass. I mean it.(>_<)

Dad29 said...

A Rich MutherFucker who thinks he can BUY AN ELECTION,

...following in the footsteps of Herb Kohl, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy...

Johnson's prolly a closet (D).

Anonymous said...

Bur for some reason the rich motherfuckers with a D by their name are somehow better than the ones with an R in the minds of biased hacks.

Anonymous said...

Hello webmaster I love your put up ….

--------------------------------------------
my website is
http://www.hancao.us

Also welcome you!