tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post906328539157161853..comments2024-01-10T07:49:11.396-06:00Comments on The Chief: The City Council, Post-ElectionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-92029493272022167282013-05-24T02:22:06.551-05:002013-05-24T02:22:06.551-05:00The very root of your writing while appearing agre...The very root of your writing while appearing agreeable initially, did not really sit properly with me <br />personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the paragraphs you managed to make me a believer unfortunately just for a very short while.<br />I however have a problem with your leaps in assumptions <br />and you might do well to fill in all those breaks.<br />In the event that you actually can accomplish that, I will surely end up being <br />fascinated.<br /><br />Also visit my web page: <a href="http://www.smt.lt/phpinfo.php?a%5B%5D=%3Ca+href=http://jordan7bordeaux.n.nu%3Ejordan+7+bordeaux%3C/a%3E" rel="nofollow"></a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-89920439861350621952011-01-29T19:05:15.175-06:002011-01-29T19:05:15.175-06:00Hey guys,
I'm new here.
Btw...Hey guys, <br /> <br />I'm new here. <br />Btw, I happen to be a [url=http://www.ndscsnano.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=103369 ]lawyer[/url], too. :D <br />Hopefully I can contribute here!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-92004128744744145222010-04-11T17:22:45.839-05:002010-04-11T17:22:45.839-05:00"If a ham sandwich runs against him, it will ..."If a ham sandwich runs against him, it will win."<br /><br />Let's hope you're right. Based on the word on the street, I bet you're right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-35432313567449055612010-04-11T03:20:57.793-05:002010-04-11T03:20:57.793-05:00It seems like "eccentric" candidates do ...It seems like "eccentric" candidates do NOT lose the loyalty of their voting base easily. Perhaps it's because it's a personality cult situation and they are voting for a TYPE not a platform, and "job performance" is less an issue with those voters who will likely believe The System is against their guy, (and with good reason because one fine day he will own their asses). <br /><br />In fact if you now have Chamber of Commerce types gaining ground that is just going to fuel the passions of the 'resistance" for whom the Chamber is like the Illuminati. My thought being it could easily be a situation of increased polarization and widening of the trenches between posses who divide the numbers of the voting public into solid and un-wavering little cliques.<br /><br />What I think will be extremely painful to watch will be the Northwestern's attempts to guide the ship of Public Opinion o'er the rocky shoals. The other day, in an effort to check up on a few events I haven't paid attention to (i.e doing a bit of homework in case I'm able to attend the Live Chat on Tues) i ran into an editorial that made no sense what-so-ever. And yeah, not exactly the first, but so joyously written as if fresh from the Hookah that just I had to stop and marvel.<br /><br />Apparently this Fitzhenry fellow was miffed about Hintz's beard? Really no clue. And no content? it was the most surreal bit of brainlessness passing off as some kind of insight onto SOMETHING that I have seen in awhile. I stopped doing ANY homework at the onw at that point and just gave up.<br /><br />This is bad news for me because you simply can NOT Snark if you haven't any material. But if your reaction to a newspaper is <i>LOLWhut???</i> just too many times, you're not gonna be able to force yourself to go back and subject yourself to it again and again. <br />The irony is that these are the same people who guffawed (yes, they guffawed, and it wasn't a pretty thing) at bloggers for having "no credibility", no new information and no redeeming value. Yet, they have deteriorated to the idiosyncratic writing styles of the least bloggers as they've tried to "diversify". They have better grammar to offer, but not any pretense to a higher level of thought than the rank and file of their forum commenters.<br />You can't just "decide" to replace people because you WANT to and it suits your purposes.<br /><br />Reading some of these "reflection' or analysis pieces is like seeing Dick Cheney put on a Wonderbra cuz he wants to make the kind of cash he's heard Pamela Anderson makes. Just cuz he's got enough loose flesh he can jam into those cups doesn't make it the same for the people lookin at 'em.<br /><br />Final Thought- <br />reading the ONW election season editorials will be at least as painful as watching the "eccentric" candidates themselves. 'n Stewie's not always man enough for that task.Dread-filled Stewienoreply@blogger.com