tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post1175315467387382311..comments2024-01-10T07:49:11.396-06:00Comments on The Chief: Michelle Monte: Not Helping Esslinger's Case Very MuchUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-90243460480106000862009-05-18T22:18:00.000-05:002009-05-18T22:18:00.000-05:005:04,
No questions were posed of Monte. She took ...5:04,<br /><br />No questions were posed of Monte. She took it upon herself to jump in and of course she was defending her husband and Esslinger. Duh. Ever wonder why none of these people can defend themselves? They're always rushing in to save each other's hide.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-54827895889988231712009-05-18T20:38:00.000-05:002009-05-18T20:38:00.000-05:00Nepotism? Hardly. Attack? Who have I "attacked?" W...Nepotism? Hardly. Attack? Who have I "attacked?" We seem to have different understandings of what that word means. In fact, my op-ed piece was quite tame compared to anything else out there. And exactly whose butt have I kissed? The Board of Appeals is overseen by the Department of Community Development, headed up by Jackson Kinney. Anyone who knows anything should know I have been one of his biggest critics over the years. Care to try explaining your comments or shall we just chalk your anonymous drivel and baseless accusations up to someone who is skilled at slinging arrows.Cheryl Hentzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13904820029032474051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-48443297437754209742009-05-18T20:17:00.000-05:002009-05-18T20:17:00.000-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Cheryl Hentzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13904820029032474051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-75601345072551142662009-05-18T17:04:00.000-05:002009-05-18T17:04:00.000-05:00Did anyone ever think that she would support givin...Did anyone ever think that she would support giving that guy one committee or the other instead of assuming? Besides, after reading her post, I took it that she was answering questions posed of her. She was not defending her husband or sticking up for Esslinger. Someone that should be questioned is Hentz who is on the attack and got her post on the Appeals Board through nepatism and has stayed there quite a while through the same process of kissing the right butt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8892866690662666995.post-38971413600097534242009-05-18T15:11:00.000-05:002009-05-18T15:11:00.000-05:00When dealing with Montes' it just isn't possible t...When dealing with Montes' it just isn't possible to find intelligence or logic...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com